Blank Issues should be enabled if they are not explicit disabled through
the `blank_issues_enabled` field of the Issue Config. The Implementation
has currently a Bug: If you create a Issue Config file with only
`contact_links` and without a `blank_issues_enabled` field,
`blank_issues_enabled` is set to false by default.
The fix is only one line, but I decided to also improve the tests to
make sure there are no other problems with the Implementation.
This is a bugfix, so it should be backported to 1.20.
Part of #27065
This reduces the usage of `db.DefaultContext`. I think I've got enough
files for the first PR. When this is merged, I will continue working on
this.
Considering how many files this PR affect, I hope it won't take to long
to merge, so I don't end up in the merge conflict hell.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Currently, Artifact does not have an expiration and automatic cleanup
mechanism, and this feature needs to be added. It contains the following
key points:
- [x] add global artifact retention days option in config file. Default
value is 90 days.
- [x] add cron task to clean up expired artifacts. It should run once a
day.
- [x] support custom retention period from `retention-days: 5` in
`upload-artifact@v3`.
- [x] artifacts link in actions view should be non-clickable text when
expired.
They currently throw a Internal Server Error when you use them without a
token. Now they correctly return a `token is required` error.
This is no security issue. If you use this endpoints with a token that
don't have the correct permission, you get the correct error. This is
not affected by this PR.
1. The old `prepareQueryArg` did double-unescaping of form value.
2. By the way, remove the unnecessary `ctx.Flash = ...` in
`MockContext`.
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Just like `models/unittest`, the testing helper functions should be in a
separate package: `contexttest`
And complete the TODO:
> // TODO: move this function to other packages, because it depends on
"models" package
This PR implements a proposal to clean up the admin users table by
moving some information out to a separate user details page (which also
displays some additional information).
Other changes:
- move edit user page from `/admin/users/{id}` to
`/admin/users/{id}/edit` -> `/admin/users/{id}` now shows the user
details page
- show if user is instance administrator as a label instead of a
separate column
- separate explore users template into a page- and a shared one, to make
it possible to use it on the user details page
- fix issue where there was no margin between alert message and
following content on admin pages
<details>
<summary>Screenshots</summary>
</details>
Partially resolves#25939
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
- Resolves https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/580
- Return a `upload_field` to any release API response, which points to
the API URL for uploading new assets.
- Adds unit test.
- Adds integration testing to verify URL is returned correctly and that
upload endpoint actually works
---------
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Fixes: #26333.
Previously, this endpoint only updates the `StatusCheckContexts` field
when `EnableStatusCheck==true`, which makes it impossible to clear the
array otherwise.
This patch uses slice `nil`-ness to decide whether to update the list of
checks. The field is ignored when either the client explicitly passes in
a null, or just omits the field from the json ([which causes
`json.Unmarshal` to leave the struct field
unchanged](https://go.dev/play/p/Z2XHOILuB1Q)). I think this is a better
measure of intent than whether the `EnableStatusCheck` flag was set,
because it matches the semantics of other field types.
Also adds a test case. I noticed that [`testAPIEditBranchProtection`
only checks the branch
name](c1c83dbaec/tests/integration/api_branch_test.go (L68))
and no other fields, so I added some extra `GET` calls and specific
checks to make sure the fields are changing properly.
I added those checks the existing integration test; is that the right
place for it?
Fixes#25564Fixes#23191
- Api v2 search endpoint should return only the latest version matching
the query
- Api v3 search endpoint should return `take` packages not package
versions
I kept sending pull requests that consisted of one-line changes. It's
time to
settle this once and for all. (Maybe.)
- Explain Gitea behavior and the consequences of each
setting better, so that the user does not have to consult
the docs.
- Do not use different spellings of identical terms
interchangeably, e.g. `e-mail` and `email`.
- Use more conventional terms to describe the same things,
e.g. `Confirm Password` instead of `Re-Type Password`.
- Introduces additional clarification for Mirror Settings
- Small adjustments in test
- This is a cry for help.
- Grammar and spelling consistencies for en-US locale
(e.g. cancelled -> canceled)
- Introduce tooltip improvements.
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
- The permalink and 'Reference in New issue' URL of an renderable file
(those where you can see the source and a rendered version of it, such
as markdown) doesn't contain `?display=source`. This leads the issue
that the URL doesn't have any effect, as by default the rendered version
is shown and thus not the source.
- Add `?display=source` to the permalink URL and to 'Reference in New
Issue' if it's renderable file.
- Add integration testing.
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1088
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Until now expired package data gets deleted daily by a cronjob. The
admin page shows the size of all packages and the size of unreferenced
data. The users (#25035, #20631) expect the deletion of this data if
they run the cronjob from the admin page but the job only deletes data
older than 24h.
This PR adds a new button which deletes all expired data.
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Follow #25229
Copy from
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/26290#issuecomment-1663135186
The bug is that we cannot get changed files for the
`pull_request_target` event. This event runs in the context of the base
branch, so we won't get any changes if we call
`GetFilesChangedSinceCommit` with `PullRequest.Base.Ref`.
- `setting.UI.Notification.EventSourceUpdateTime` is by default 10
seconds, which adds an 10 second delay before the test succeeds.
- Lower the interval to reduce it to at most 3 second delay (the code
only send events when they are at least 2 seconds old).
(cherry picked from commit 3adb9ae6009ff3ddebaed4875e086343f668ef7b)
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1166
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
